As a Lawyer, You Sent the Judge In? (Strong Wind And Thick Fog) - Chapter 475

Chapter 475 Death penalty! Another death penalty!

The comments and jokes in the live broadcast room of the court are just a small episode.

 It will not affect the progress of the entire case.

 In this case.

 The content of the prosecutor’s statement is basically based on Liang Xinglong’s confession and the overall details of the case.

The entire accusation is based not only on oral confessions, but also on indirect factual evidence as supporting evidence.

 After the prosecution has completed its statement.

 Originally, Su Bai was preparing to make certain civil demands as the victim.

　　But what I didn’t expect was.

　　Su Bai had not yet raised certain civil litigation requirements.

 There was already a quarrel at the defendant’s seat.

 Xie An and Liang Xinglong accused each other and cursed each other during the trial.

Xie An’s main accusation was that Liang Xinglong was the instigator in this case.

 Turn your head and take no responsibility at all, and put away your own responsibilities.

 At the same time, he also stepped on Xie Lirong.

 Criticized Liang Xinglong for having no conscience.

 But Liang Xinglong had no conscience towards Xie Lirong. He just wanted to make money from Xie Lirong.

 Now that this kind of criminal issue is involved, of course, one needs to take one’s own interests as the starting point.

  Come and think for yourself.

In order to perform well at the trial, Liang Xinlong also stated that Xie An was still not guilty at the trial.

 And applied to the presiding judge to impose a heavy sentence on Xie An.

 Huge conflicts arose between the two sides.

During this process, Xie Lirong looked at Liang Xinglong with a little disappointment.

 It seems that he can’t believe that Liang Xinglong would do such a thing.

 But according to his understanding of Liang Xinglong, Liang Xinglong seems to be like this.

Thinking of this, a trace of regret flashed across Xie Lirong’s face.

 But now regret has no meaning.

In addition, Xie An also wanted to obtain some light sentences for Xie Lirong and his wife in the court hearing.

 Hence, the accusation based on Liang Xinglong’s oral confession was not accepted at the court hearing.

I want to have the presiding judge accept his statement at the judgment seat.

“Presiding judge…this case is not what Liang Xinglong stated.”

“Liang Xinglong concealed something in his confession in this case.”

“My wife and my daughter Xie Lirong don’t know much about this matter.”

 “They belong to the ignorant.”

　　　….”

Xie An’s statement was completely incoherent and illogical. It also did not talk about realistic objective evidence and objective conditions.

However, when faced with Xie An’s statement in the court hearing, the presiding judge directly rejected it.

 What is the situation in this case?

The situation in this case is that what Liang Xinglong stated was based on facts, and the factual basis was combined with the oral confession to make the appeal.

 At the trial, Xie An stated that Xie Lirong did not know much about the case.

 At the same time, he also expressed that his wife had no knowledge of the case.

 But whether he knows or not is not Xie An’s decision.

Of course Hu Yuxiang, as the presiding judge, does not count.

Knowing or not needs to be determined based on legal circumstances and factual evidence.

In this case, Xie Lirong and Xie Lirong’s mother have been asking Liu Xuewei’s family for money.

 Unknown to you in this situation? How could you not know?

 Hence, Hu Yuxiang, as the presiding judge, directly rejected the defendant’s litigation opinions.

 And no longer allow the defendant to state relevant opinions.

“The defendant’s litigation opinions are not based on factual and legal basis, so the confession seems a little weak, and there is a possibility of false confession.”

“Based on this point, the collegial panel shall not adopt the defendant’s litigation opinions.”

“at the same time.”

“The defendant is required not to speak out and present his relevant litigation opinions again without permission.”

　　I then hit the hammer and looked at the victim’s seat:

“The victim’s family and their attorney filed additional civil litigation requirements in this case.”

“Please ask the victim to entrust a lawyer or the victim’s family to state all the litigation requirements and opinions.”

Su Bai took a deep breath at the victim’s lawyer’s seat.

The case has finally progressed to the point where the victim has entrusted a lawyer to state his claims.

 Judging from the circumstances of this court hearing, this case is beneficial to the victim.

 Because no matter from the factual evidence point of view, it is from the presiding judge’s request that the defendant not make a statement.

It can all be seen that in this case, the victim’s side, that is, their side, has a huge advantage.

Su Bai looked up at the presiding judge’s seat and said:

 “A good judge.”

“Our request for criminal proceedings is to impose a harsher sentence on the criminal liability of the persons involved in this case.”

“The civil litigation requirement is that in this case, in order to obtain Liu Xuewei’s property, Xie Lirong teamed up with others to kill Liu Xuewei.”

“This has seriously violated the definition of the nature of the relationship between husband and wife in the Marriage Law.”

“We request that Xie Lirong’s marriage as Liu Xuewei’s wife be dissolved.”

“At the same time, regarding the division of property, according to the evidence from our investigation, during their relationship as husband and wife, Liu Xuewei and Xie Lirong received a total of 536,784 yuan in joint property.”

“Among them, nearly 400,000 yuan is with Xie Lirong.”

“In this case, Xie Lirong seriously violated the facts of marriage, not just cheating.”

“Furthermore, after the affair, when faced with Liu Xuewei’s request to repay the joint property of the couple, he actually committed a subjective act of intentionally hurting or even killing his husband.” “What is this kind of behavior?”

“This kind of behavior already has the motive of intentional homicide.”

“Legally speaking, there is a causal relationship between Xie Lirong’s subjective motivation and the death of Liu Xuewei.”

 “From the perspective of the relationship between husband and wife and marriage.”

 “Xie Lirong made major mistakes in her marriage.”

“Based on this, we require Xie Lirong to leave the house clean and return the property jointly owned by her husband and wife.”

“In addition, regarding the situation where Xie Lirong and Liu Xuewei had a child during their marriage.”

“As for the custody of the child, we apply for Liu Xuezhi, the younger brother of our victim-client, to be the main caregiver.”

 “The reason is as follows:”

“First, Xie Lirong made major mistakes in her marriage to Liu Xuewei.”

“Second: According to our investigation, it can be seen that Xie Lirong is not kind to the child she had with Liu Xuewei.”

“This kind of badness not only refers to the bad living environment, but also the bad attitude and mental quality.”

“As a mother, Xie Lirong completely failed to fulfill her maternal obligations.”

“He even gave the child to his mother to raise, and used the child to negotiate property with Liu Xuewei’s family, with the subjective idea of ​​transferring custody rights.”

“From this point of view, Xie Lirong completely used the child as a means to make money, as an item to obtain property from Liu Xuewei’s family.”

“Based on this, we believe that Xie Lirong is completely unqualified as a mother.”

“Based on the above reasons, we apply to determine that Liu Xuewei’s younger brother Liu Xuezhi shall be the main caregiver of the child.”

　　　….”

Su Bai’s lawsuit application was all based on the entrustment application of Liu Xuewei’s family.

Of course, these lawsuit applications have legal basis.

In this case, as long as Xie Lirong is sentenced, she will be the party with major faults in the marriage.

It is very likely that the child will be judged to have left the house and be deprived of custody rights.

 As for divorce…Divorce is definitely a divorce.

 The court’s decision, as a judicial decision, is far superior to administrative decisions in some aspects.

Even if Xie Lirong is not sentenced, as long as there is such a motive of subjective harm, it is entirely possible for a divorce to be decreed judicially.

 The statement is completed.

Su Bai raised his head slightly and looked at the judgment seat.

 At the presiding judge’s seat, Hu Yuxiang serves as the presiding judge in this case.

After listening to Su Bai’s lawsuit, he nodded slightly.

This time, Su Bai’s claims were normal and there was nothing unreasonable about them.

to be honest.…

 In this case, the only thing that needs to be discussed is whether Xie An, as the murderer of Liu Xuewei, should be sentenced to death.

As for other things…for example, whether Xie Lirong should be sentenced to a prison term, and whether she had any major faults in the marriage.

These situations are all positive.

  There is no need to discuss too much because there is no need for much discussion.

 As for the question of whether Xie An should be sentenced to death, to be honest, this issue is relatively serious.

Why do you say that?

 The main reason why the death sentence was suspended in the first instance was because Xie An had surrendered and had a letter of understanding.

 But based on the current situation, what is going on?

 It is now clear that the whole case is a conspiracy case.

So from this point of view, Xie Lirong’s presentation of the letter of understanding was subjective and intentional.

 In other words, issuing a letter of understanding is just a process in their planning.

 This process is illegal.

 Because from their subjective point of view, they want to commit a criminal act, so their behavior in the entire process is illegal.

 And what do they belong to?

 It is a legal bug!

 This point is definitely not recognized by the law.

 Especially where conspiring to kill is committed.

so.…

From these circumstances, the judgment of Xie An is also obvious.

 That is to say, the sentencing result of the first instance cannot be supported.

  If we do not support the penalty result of the first instance, what will be the final result?

 In the end, it is very likely that the death penalty will be imposed.

 This point… has been explained in detail when the prosecutor just recommended the sentence.

And when the prosecutor just stated the specific details of the case, the recommended sentence was the death penalty.

 So…in this case.

 In this case, the final result is obvious.

 That is—to sentence Xie An to death.

 And the verdict is that Xie An’s wife, Xie Lirong, and Liang Xinglong involved,

 In cases of conspiracy to commit murder, different sentences will be imposed!

 The situation and content stated by the lawyer entrusted by the victim.

 They all have legal support and legal basis.

And it is not too much. After all, Liu Xuewei, the victim, is dead, and these lawsuit applications are very reasonable.

  Basically, we can agree with all the litigation applications stated by the victim’s attorney.

Hu Yuxiang was silently calculating the specific circumstances of this case.

 Be prepared to listen to the court statements from all parties, and then make a judgment on the case based on the specific circumstances of the case.

.

 ….

 PS: Please give me a monthly ticket~

 (End of this chapter)